Services
ControlOps Drift Assurance
A risk-led service to identify Microsoft control drift, explain where assurance is weakening, and give leadership a practical plan to restore control.
Why control drift matters
Most Microsoft estates do not fail because a control was never designed. They fail because controls drift quietly after rollout.
Conditional Access changes. Endpoint settings lose consistency. Defender and Purview controls weaken over time. Secure Score moves, but few teams can clearly explain why.
Common signs of drift
- Secure Score changes without clear ownership
- Controls vary across users, devices, or business units
- Policies exist, but evidence of effectiveness is weak
- Leadership reporting is snapshot-based rather than operational
What the service covers
A focused review of the Microsoft control planes where assurance tends to weaken over time.
Identity & Access
Entra ID, Conditional Access, privileged access, role hygiene, and policy consistency.
Endpoint & Device Control
Intune posture, Defender for Endpoint configuration, and control consistency across managed devices.
Data Protection & Purview
Sensitivity labels, DLP, governance controls, and evidence that protection is working as intended.
Secure Score & Assurance Signals
Trend analysis, recommendation quality, score movement, and what those changes actually mean.
ControlOps engineering
From point-in-time assessment to repeatable assurance
Traditional security assessments provide a useful snapshot, but the evidence, control relationships, and recommendations are often difficult to repeat or maintain. ControlOps engineering creates the foundations for a more structured and traceable assurance model.
01
Evidence sources
Tenant configuration, security signals, architecture documents, policies, standards, and control-owner evidence.
02
Control intelligence
Evidence is normalised and related to controls, risks, technologies, framework requirements, and previous findings.
03
Human assurance
Findings are reviewed by an experienced security architect and challenged against business context, risk, and control intent.
04
Decisions
Leadership receives traceable findings, prioritised remediation, evidence packs, and a clearer view of residual risk.
An evidence-led approach
365 Signal is building a secure, evidence-led ControlOps capability that combines Microsoft tenant data, control frameworks, architecture documentation, and operational signals.
The aim is not to replace security architects, control owners, or auditors. It is to give them better evidence, stronger traceability, and a more repeatable way to assess whether controls remain effective.
Capability foundations
- Read-only collection through Microsoft Graph and approved APIs
- Structured mapping of evidence to controls, risks, and frameworks
- Retrieval across policies, architecture, standards, and assessments
- Identification of control gaps, contradictory evidence, and drift
- Schema-controlled outputs and human review before conclusions are relied upon
What clients receive
- Current-state control and evidence review
- Traceable drift findings by security domain
- Prioritised remediation actions
- Leadership-ready risk and assurance summary
- Evidence gaps and ownership weaknesses
- Recommended review frequency and validation triggers
- Control-to-risk and framework mapping where required
- Practical roadmap for improved assurance
Restore control before drift becomes exposure
365 Signal helps organisations move from snapshot reporting to measurable, evidence-led assurance across the Microsoft security stack.
Start a conversation